3.05.2010

A Day Riding Shotgun with the Baltimore Police

So it has been exactly 627 days from my last post on my once-world-famous blog. Anyway, we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief because, after my post tonight, I promise not to post for at least another 627 days. [If you want a few (or fifteen) good laughs, scroll to the bottom of this post and read my posts from when I actually thought I was a blogger.] The subject of my only post of 2010 is my day spent with the Baltimore Police Department. This entry will be ridiculously long, and I doubt it will be funny or too well-written. I am doing it primarily so that I have my own record of my day with the cops. Feel free to read all, some, or none of the post. I really couldn’t care less what you do. Anyway, here it goes, the backstory first:

On November 6, 2009, I sat down with Major Melvin Russell, Commander of the Eastern District of the Baltimore City Police Department, to do an interview for a history course I was taking at the time, The Power of Place: Race and Community in East Baltimore, taught by Melanie Shell-Weiss. A primary aim of the course was to help create recorded oral histories of people familiar with Middle East, an East Baltimore neighborhood just north of the Johns Hopkins University Medical Campus, which is currently being redeveloped. After interviewing Major Russell for the project, he told me and my partner, Hopkins senior Jenny Klein, that we were more than welcome to ride along with a patrolman or woman for a day if we ever wanted. Finally, on March 2, Jenny and I took Major Russell up on his offer.

In an email, Major Russell instructed Jenny and me to get to Headquarters by 6:30 AM. It was still dark out, and we definitely had our driver confused as to why two college kids wanted to go to police headquarters so early on a Tuesday morning. Once we arrived, we were greeted warmly and signed some series of papers in which we promised that we would not hold the police responsible for anything that happened to us. I decided to skip to the bottom section to sign the papers; I did not want to know what dangerous possibilities lay ahead. We then waited for roll call, which began promptly at 6:39 (not one minute earlier or later). Aside from what I expected to see (a few cops were commended for excellent service recently, and the sergeant gave a small motivational speech, the only interesting moment was when the sergeant distributed reading material for his patrolmen and women. I don't recall exactly what the Xeroxed reading was on, but it consisted more of inspiration and philosophy than of policing or city issues.

Some observations from the events surrounding roll call:

1) There were many fewer cops to cover one of the most dangerous districts in one of the most dangerous cities in America than I expected.

2) There was only female cop...I expected more (maybe 25%) of them to be women.

3) There was a very good and healthy mix of racial diversity among the patrolmen. I would say there were about the same number of black and white cops, and there were one or two Asian and Latino cops. However, maybe the 50-50 white-black ratio is not a healthy mix, given the fact that the district is overwhelmingly black. Even though I don't normally like to use race as a primary identifier, I think it's important in this context (and will be throughout the post).

4) Everyone got along great, joking with (and playing pranks on) each other, discussing their upcoming football game, etc. Nobody seemed stressed or anxious about what is very dangerous work.

After roll call, I was assigned my patrolman, a white man in his mid-20s, whom I will refer to only by his first initial, A. After introducing himself to me, A. asked me if I was wearing a vest. I had no idea what he was talking about; I was wearing a red hoodie, and I thought that was pretty evident. I responded to his question by telling him that, no, I did not have a vest, and I quickly learned that he was referring to a bulletproof vest, which is required for riding along with a cop. Unfortunately, however, the Eastern District was out of vests. I could either go home or take my chances. Of course, using my four-year Hopkins education, I decided to take my chances. If 50 Cent got shot nine times, what's one bullet, right?

[From here on out, I will provide time estimates that will not be terribly precise. They are not completely accurate but will help structure my day.]

7:30 AM: We leave headquarters and are on our way. Our first stop was for breakfast at a local Royal Farms. It's the closest thing to WaWa (which is one of the few things Philly has over New York) I've ever seen, and it's unfortunate that there are none within walking distance of Hopkins. Anyway, at RF I met another cop, a middle-aged African American, who quickly told me that I would learn a lot on my ride and that I would realize that just about all criticism of the police was unfounded. He noted (somewhat accurately, I would learn), that the media (whether it be the Baltimore Sun, TV, or YouTube videos) highlights only bits and pieces of incidents, often focusing on the final minute of an arrest or a rare moment of excessive brutality taken out of context. He also told me how being a cop makes one increasingly paranoid, to the point where he and his wife are afraid to open the front door to their house after ordering pizza delivery; A., who I learned takes his gun everywhere with him, including the shower, agreed.

7:50 AM: Our first stop was a car crash a few blocks from Hopkins Med (JHMI). A relatively young Indian woman was on her way to work at the hospital when she ran a stop-sign and crashed into a middle-aged African-American woman and (I think) her son, on the way to school. Nobody was seriously hurt (the cars were damaged significantly), but the Indian woman was shaken up and would not stop crying for a half hour. It was kind of like one of my favorite movies, Crash. Ok, not really. Anyway, after the tow truck came and a police report was filed, we went on our way and dropped the woman off at Hopkins. Another cop who was on the scene took the mother and son to school.

8:15 AM: Our next stop was a bit more exciting. A. stopped a man loitering on a street corner, presumably involved in some aspect of the drug trade. I'm not sure what exactly was on him drug-wise, but the man didn't seem too concerned; he laughed and mocked A. and the other cops who came on the scene. He first lied about his name and about the amount of money on him (both of which are apparently common, even though lying gets you nowhere in the end). He did have everyone laughing when he told us that we could remember his last name, which was Cain. "Just like cocaine," he boasted. Also of note: Mr. Cain is not even 20, he was born in 1991. As Cain was taken into a wagon in handcuffs, A. told me that he would be back out on the corner in no-time. They go in and out on a regular basis, in jail one day and free the next. This would be a recurring theme and is something I never really understood throughout the day.

9:00 AM: We then drove back toward Hopkins and went a few blocks southwest of JHMI. A. spotted an older white guy walking around some housing projects and said that he had to be looking for drugs. He thought that he had seen him before, but he also remarked that, since the neighborhood is almost entirely black, any white person stands out. A. calls the area VFW, which stands for Very Few Whites; the only reason for a white person to be in the area is drug-related. This particular white person eventually became engaged in conversation with an older black man until we drove up, when the two went their separate ways. The white guy got into a car, and we followed for a bit, but we eventually stopped by the time we were along the border of the Southeast District.

Now might be an appropriate place to note that A.'s territory covers a relatively small 4- by 10-block radius. He drives through the same streets daily and knows the blocks (and people) very well. Some people wave, and some people run. I guess it's just part of the job. We took a break at Walgreens, where I used the bathroom (being with a cop helps in obtaining the keycode to the employees-only bathroom), and A. picked up a few random items. At the register, the lady (who seemed to recognize A.) asked if I was his son, which was one of the stranger moments of the day, given the fact that we are only about five years apart. Either I look like I'm eight-years old, or he looks like he's forty, I guess.

9:25 AM: We then drove back to cover the radius, where we found four older black men hanging out on a block. Some older men like to hang out and drink, and others apparently are involved in drugs. A. allows the drunks to drink all they want, but the older dealers and users are not so fortunate, I later learned.

Over the course of the day, A. and I discussed a lot of random topics. From baseball (we both hate A-Rod) to football (he doesn't root for the Ravens because he believes that, just like it was wrong for Indianapolis to take the Colts from Baltimore, it was wrong for Baltimore to take the Browns from Cleveland), we discussed a ton of sports. We talked about politics (policing has made him increasingly more conservative, but he is optimistic about our new mayor) and policy (he has seen too many welfare and disability checks go entirely to drugs). I felt compelled to ask about The Wire ("Is it accurate?"), and he responded, somewhat surprisingly, that, yes, it is. It might not depict Baltimore completely accurately ALL of the time, but, on the whole, there is apparently a lot of truth to David Simon’s award-winning show. My sense (after admittedly only one day) is that he was right. We also talked about the best types of girls for policemen, but I am going to leave the details of that conversation out in case the children are reading.

10:15 AM: A. was informed that there was a suicide attempt being made in his area. In many ways, this was the scariest call of the day; I expected plenty of drug- and gun-related calls, but I did not expect to have to witness someone trying to (or succeeding in) killing themselves. We got to the address in a matter of minutes, and we met two cops, one of whom was told to guard the back door. We went up to the front door and knocked, but the only response was the loud, persistent barking of what seemed to be a very large dog. Nobody answered, and apparently there was no indication that anyone was home. A. figured that the call had been made from a third party and that, if there was, in fact, a suicide attempt, it was not at this house. I was relieved that this was a false alarm.

It was around this point where I began to appreciate the camaraderie that exists among police officers. Even though there are hundreds of police officers in Baltimore City, A. and I continued to run into the same five or six guys at every call. Most of these were the men (and the woman) whom I had met at roll, but there also were two plainclothes cops who drove an unmarked vehicle, working in the Eastern. They all joked with each other and knew each other’s quirks, but, when the moment came to respond to a call, they were focused and professional.

10:50 AM: For what seemed like the billionth time, A. got a call to report to such-and-such corner, and he immediately turned on his siren, going from 15 MPH to 70 MPH in a matter of seconds. It really is pretty cool going really fast and watching car after car move out of the way for you. We were splitting the Red Sea faster than Moses ever could have dreamed of doing, and, almost immediately, we were at our destination, where we ran into a few familiar cops who had caught some older African-American men, one of whom was supposedly dealing drugs to the others, I think. It was unclear to me if any drugs were actually found on any of them, and, after some questioning, they let three of the four go free. However, the cops took in the one guy they suspected of dealing the drugs (I think), in part because of the large amount of cash he had on him. He had initially insisted he only had five dollars on him, but the sum was much greater. Like Mr. Cocaine, this got him into trouble, I guess, and he was taken in the paddy wagon to who-knows-where.

11:30 AM: I wasn’t sure what I was going to do about lunch, since I was getting hungry, and I was not going to be dropped off at the Homewood campus for another two hours. However, A. asked me where I wanted to get my food—he had packed his lunch—since we would be taking a quick break soon. My options, he told me, were McDonald’s, Burger King, and Subway. Since anyone who knows me knows I love and crave onion rings, they should know the choice was easy: Burger King. Had I known that, by picking Burger King, I was getting us involved in another incident, I might have picked McDonald’s instead. On second thought, no, our BK stop ended up being one of the most interesting, amusing, and sad of the day, with my onion rings-based decision ultimately helping to resolve a conflict between two employees.

When we pulled into BK, A. and I immediately noticed two groups of teenage girls, each with its own car, shouting at each other in the parking lot. We stopped, and the store’s manager ran onto the scene, ecstatic to see us. The girls were in the middle of a fight, she explained, and she wanted A. to resolve the problem; he radioed for assistance. After a few other cops arrived, the manager, with all the girls huddled around, quickly explained the situation, in one of the more bizarre moments of the day. Two employees—both with either identical or very similar names—used to be close friends. Then, a while ago, they stopped talking to each other. Over the weekend, someone wrote something mean about one of the girls on Facebook prompting anger and fear among both girls and their support groups, or crews. On Monday, one of them brought her crew to work to make sure she was safe and protected. Today, on Tuesday, the other girl brought her crew; she was worried and wanted to protect herself. Two Burger King employees who used to be good friends…in a fight…OVER FACEBOOK! If it wasn’t real, I would’ve laughed. Actually, by the time we got back in the car (no one was taken in, and the squabble was resolved, at least temporarily), both A. and I were laughing at the ridiculousness of it all. (He also checked one of the girls’ cars pretty thoroughly, on what basis I wasn’t sure.) Oh and about those onion rings: by the time we pulled up to the Drive-Thru, I had totally forgotten my reason for picking BK and ordered chicken nuggets and fries.

12:15 PM: A little while later, we were again speeding toward another drug-related arrest. Our two undercover cop friends had caught an older African-American man selling heroin to an older African-American woman. This time, there was no doubt about evidence; the man had a lot of cash on him, and he had the drugs. A. asked me if I had ever seen heroin before, and I replied that no, I hadn’t. One of the undercover guys proceeded to show me a few capsules that he said would go for about ten dollars on the street. Finally, I had seen heroin. At least I could cross something off the old bucket list. At this point, the cops (two undercover and two regular patrolmen) were joking a bit, especially as the wait for the paddy wagon (or just wagon, as the cool kids call it) grew longer. This is when I learned a little about heroin dealing and the similarities between dealing heroin and selling any other product. Apparently, new heroin gets put on the market all the time, especially at the beginning of the month when people get disability and unemployment checks. For the first few days, dealers distribute free samples—just like Costco, I imagine—to introduce the new product and get people hooked. The handcuffed man and woman on the side of the curb were just a part of that game. For the first time all day, I was really depressed, especially as I watched them walk into the wagon. Sure, they were participating in illegal behavior, but, as I learned throughout the day, most of these guys (young and old, male and female) would be back out on the street in two days. That’s why Cain was laughing when A. arrested him, and that’s why A. recognized so many of the people on the street. The cops were doing their job as best as they could. It was the system and priorities of the system that seemed to be failing.

12:40 PM: Our next stop was of a different sort and was the most low-key of the day. Someone’s car’s tires had been slashed repeatedly, and the car’s owner—a middle-aged African-American man—wanted us to check the car out and write a report up. We showed up on the scene, and, like the Burger King manager, he seemed grateful to see us. Once in a while people really do appreciate the police, I guess. Apparently this man’s daughter’s ex-boyfriend had been taking out his anger on his ex by slashing tire after tire of the cars belonging to the ex’s family, and he had just done it again. He invited us into a beautiful rowhouse, and A. explained that all he could do was file another police report. In addition, if the gentleman filed some sort of restraining order against the man whom he thought was responsible for the tire-slashing, he could be arrested if he was near the cars and tried to do it again. Even though A. did not resolve the problem, it was good to see that there could be some genuine interaction between police officers and community residents. The Wire didn’t have to be true all the time.

1:00 PM: A. was about to take me back to Hopkins when we got our final call of the day. I didn’t hear what was said on the radio, but I could tell that A. thought it was serious. I was wondering what was going on, and I guess A. read my mind, telling me that there was “an armed person.” “This time,” he said, “you should stay in the car.” Given the fact that I did not have a vest on, I grudgingly agreed, eventually realizing it was the prudent thing to do. A minute or two later, we were on the scene. I heard no gunshots, and I saw no guns; in fact, I didn’t see many people milling about the public housing complex composed of low rises, pretty close to Hopkins’ medical campus. A number of other cops came to the scene, and I couldn’t tell what was going on. Ten minutes later, A. returned. Some “juveniles” had gotten into a fight, but there did not seem to be any firearms involved, which was fine with me. I had made it to the end of my ride and even got a little bonus time.

As we left East Baltimore and headed back to my main turf, A. turned up the radio (the one for music, not the one for communicating), for the last time. There’s really nothing like listening to Lil Wayne—who, one of these days, will finally go to prison for a year on gun charges—after chasing the bad guys for six hours. A. and I talked a bit more—I got the sense that this was a somewhat quiet day for him—and he reflected on the rather pathetic state of crime in Baltimore. After finding out that I was from New York, he reminded me of a sad statistic with which I was already familiar: New York is ten times as big as Baltimore population-wise, but it has about only one hundred more murders a year. Or, in other term: Baltimore averaged 37 murders for every 100,000 people in 2008, and New York averaged 6.3 murders per 100,000. I’m not really sure what exactly those numbers mean, but they are interesting to consider. After a twenty-minute drive (unfortunately we did not have the sirens blaring and had to obey traffic laws to get me back to campus), we pulled up to 34th Street and N. Charles. I got out of the car, directly in front of Hopkins kids going to and from classes. There really is nothing like getting out of a police car, at least when you’re not in cuffs, forced out from the backseat.

A few thoughts/a summary of my six hours with the police (in no particular order):

1) We really do not understand or appreciate the work that goes into fighting crime; it is a lengthy, complicated process, and we only see the end result taken out of context (and sometimes not even that). Like everyone else, police officers make mistakes, but the media rarely gives us the opportunity to fully understand what goes into arresting someone.

2) Just as many older people seemed to be getting into trouble as younger people, which was interesting, especially considering the fact that multiple cops told me that the most involved law-breakers were juveniles (because the punishments are much less for them). All of these old people seemed to have been involved in drugs for decades and were not about to change their ways.

3) There were instances where it seemed as if people were being handcuffed and brought into custody for no apparent crime (other than, say, loitering). I’m sure there were aspects of these arrests that I didn’t understand (and I didn’t want to ask too many questions), but it did seem like the police were bringing in (admittedly bad) people on questionable charges. But what do I know?

4) The Wire devotes a lot of time to critiquing and criticizing the system that contributes to crime as much it criticizes the criminals themselves. I now understand why. There seem to be little virtue in arresting criminal after criminal on relatively petty charges, only to see them back on the street in a matter of weeks, if not days. Not to go on a tangent, but the burglar who was killed by a Hopkins student in the fall had been arrested more than two dozen times and had only just gotten out of jail before he was killed. Either these criminals need to stay in jail for a longer period of time so that they actually get off the streets, or we need to prioritize (and invest money and time in) the lives of the most impoverished and vulnerable members of our society so that they do not end up in and out of jail for the duration of their lives.

5) Baltimore promotes itself as a city of diverse neighborhoods, something I have learned to appreciate more and more. From Hampden to Fed Hill and Mt. Vernon to Canton, Baltimore has a lot to offer its residents and tourists beyond the Inner Harbor, and neighborhoods can really change in a matter of blocks. For a New Yorker, the quick contrast between neighborhoods is somewhat like that of East Harlem and the Upper East Side, separated by East 96th Street (except more drastic and replicated tens of times). The area immediately around the Hopkins Med School is definitely safe, at least during the day; there are lots of people out on the street, and there is a strong police and security presence. However, only three or four blocks in any direction, and the safety of Hopkins no longer holds. A high percentage of the incidents I witnessed on Tuesday took place within a half mile of JHMI.

6) Policing can (and for many people, is) a somewhat regular job. Like most difficult jobs, it has its share of stressful moments, and those moments are obviously of a different type than that of most other jobs. Still, many of the police officers I met seem to treat it as a somewhat normal job. For A., it was less stressful than his previous job; he didn’t have to “bring work home” with him after his shift, like he did before and can at least live a relaxed life when off duty.

7) Mayor Dixon did not seem to be popular with the cops. Maybe this was just because they never got gift cards to Best Buy, but I found this somewhat surprising considering the fact that she was very popular before her conviction and crime did drop significantly during her terms. Apparently a mayor’s popularity is strongly tied to his or her relationship with the union, and Mayor Dixon wanted to reduce pensions or retirement benefits for cops. Somewhat ironic, considering the fact that, despite her conviction, Dixon will receive all her retirement benefits. Major Russell had been very praiseworthy of her, but his position is an appointed (and, thus more political) one, so that could help to explain that.

8) Riding in the front of a cop car is really fun.

9) Finally: We can criticize and challenge America’s criminal justice system—whether or not arrest after arrest of the same people is financially or socially effective is debatable—but the police officers in the Eastern just seemed to be doing their job as well as possible. Sometimes, it is probably effective, and many (maybe even most) times it is not, but the team of cops I met handled every incident quickly, responsibly, and professionally. In my mind, that’s all you can really ask of them.

See you in 2012.

6.16.2008

The Real Race Begins (and a cartoon)

In its handling of the Rev. Wright and Priest Pfleger situations, the false rumors of Obama's anti-Israel sentiments, and the lies about Michelle Obama, the Obama campaign has demonstrated an uncanny ability to handle all the curveballs (or knuckleballs, to use a more appropriate baseball analogy) thrown its way. But now the general election begins, and as easy as it was to compare the Clinton Campaign's tactics to Karl Rove and the Republicans, we probably have no idea what we're in for over the summer and into the fall. From his race to his name to his patriotism, the Republicans will not leave any card unturned and not hesitate to rewrite Obama's background, history, and years as a public servant. They will do this both subtly (by McCain and his closest people) and overtly (by his supporters more on the fringe). All signs suggest that the Obama Campaign knows this and that it is ready to handle it, but, still, we have no idea what might happen. Let's hope Obama can catch those knuckleballs.

Oh, and this recent cartoon by Mike Peters in the Dayton Daily News was just too good to pass up:

5.23.2008

The Lost Meaning of Memorial Day

I was on the 6 this morning, and at 51st street, a man got on the train, asking for donations for himself and his family. The man was like many panhandlers: homeless, somewhat old, hobbled, selling some sort of newspaper for a buck. But the man was also a Vietnam Vet, and he used his war experience to spice up his script asking for money on this Friday, the beginning of a long weekend.

He reminded his (mostly ignoring) public that there was much more to Memorial Day than an extra-long weekend, sales at the mall, or a barbecue. It used to mean something: recognition of the sacrifices that thousands of Americans have made over the years in defense of our country. Along with that recognition of the dead should also be the honor for the living, but as the man on the subway reminded us we fail to do so.

This has nothing to do with support of the war but rather respect for the selfless individuals who do what most of us would rather not.

A few things worth thinking about this weekend:

  • According to the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, one out of every three homeless men are veterans. 200,00 veterans are on the street on any given night, and more than 400,000 veterans will experience homelessness over the course of a year. Those numbers are staggering,
  • No soldier should feel like s/he as no choice left but to kill his/herself, as has been the case with more than 1000 troops, a fact swept under the rug by the current administration and most of the mainstream media.
Technically, Memorial Day commemorates our fallen soldiers, and Veterans Day commemorates the living who have survived. Is there really any difference when we're ignoring the living, letting them live in poverty and die right before our eyes?

Enjoy the weekend. But don't forget the people who can't.

5.05.2008

Hoosiers: From Gene Hackman's Lips to Obama's (Goofy Big) Ears

So with Barack a little bit behind in Indiana, I thought it would be only appropriate to post one of the best sports movie speeches from one of the best sports movies ever. Hoosiers is, as any sports or movie fan should know, the Oscar-nominated classic about a small-town high school basketball team in Indiana that beats the odds to win the state championship. It's based on a true story, with the 1954 Milan HS team upsetting the bigger, heavily favored teams to win the 'chip.

Why can't tomorrow be any different? As Coach Norman Dale (Hackman) says, "Remember what got you here." Simple but important advice, and if Barack heeds similar advice tomorrow and throughout what could be one more month of primaries, I'm confident the Milan HS of the 2008 Democratic Primaries will prevail.

4.23.2008

Who's Ready for a Third (and Fourth) Bush Term?

As expected last night, Hillary won PA--a state as perfectly suited to her as any--dragging the primary season into May and possibly June. Mathematically, Hillary has no shot at winning the nomination: even with her ten-point win, Barack has many more delegates, states, and votes. Numerically, the victory didn't change a thing. If anything, the fact that Obama went from being down 25 points to inching within single digits should be just as big a deal, but the media won't tell you that.

The media won't tell you that, because the media loves the race. It's new, different, and exciting. And, given the fact that the Republicans have sealed their nomination, there's very little else to talk about. A woman and an African American, fighting until the death in the most historic primary, probably ever. Two brilliant candidates, going at it, attacking each other, with the proportion of time devoted to the critical issues--Iraq, healthcare, the economy, education, climate change, etc--even smaller than it was before! Chris Matthews, who is often full of meaningless rants, was right on point last night, when he critiqued the same business that employs him: "We've created the delusion that this race is still open...If you work hard and play by the rules---the Clinton maxim--then this election process is moving forward and Barack Obama is moving toward the nomination"

Supposedly, the Clintons love the Democratic Party. Theoretically, they care about its goals, and they care about its success in November. They say they don't want John McCain to be elected and continue another eight years of the same failed Bush policies. Every day that the race drags on, when it is realistically over, brings us another day closer to McCain's inauguration.

Has Obama put Hillary away? Absolutely not. But he's been in the lead for months now, and the burden is not on him. (Here might be an appropriate place to note that, if Obama was losing by the same margins as Hillary is, he would have been forced out by Howard Dean and the party leaders long ago.) By not throwing in the towel out of respect for her party and the country she claims to love, Hillary has reinforced all the negative stereotypes that have been directed her way. Her recent attack ads, in which, according to the NY Times--a Clinton endorser-- she used tactics "torn right from Karl Rove’s playbook" are not helping. Still, given all that, a sliver of hope remains that she may decide to try to recognize reality and (somewhat) restore her image so that she can continue what had been a largely remarkable political career.

Somewhere, John McCain is smiling. Let's hope that we don't look back on April 22nd, 2008, as the day that he clinched the election.

4.17.2008

Why I Support Barack Obama

Back in December, at a Chanukah party, I was explaining to a friend's parent that I would be spending the first week of the new year (including my birthday) in New Hampshire, canvassing for Barack Obama ahead of the January 8th primary. My parents--who, for better or for worse, normally will fund whatever I want to do--told me I'd have to pay my way to get there. So up to NH I went with 50 New Yorkers, in vans of ten people each, headed toward a Red Roof Inn to share a room with three strangers. At the time, I didn't really know the specific reason why I was going, but I knew that I needed to go; I couldn't exactly formulate my reasons to this friend's dad, and I clearly couldn't convince my mom, who told me to find my own $250 to canvass for Obama in two feet snow during my vacation.

But, by the time our van dropped us off at 34th street and 8th avenue, one day after Barack's primary loss and a day after entering my third decade, I realized I knew why I went, but, until now, I never put my thought process into words:

We are at a critical juncture at a critical time. Any election is important, but the winner of the 2008 election will have a unique opportunity to either continue the policies of the current administration--which have failed us and the world--or to reshape and reform the United States' role in the world for the better. We have a chance to begin to make amends for the past eight years and to begin to move the country forward in a more positive direction.

The direction in which the Democrats want to take the country is quite clear. From Iraq to healthcare to climate change, the Democrats vying for the '08 nomination have long agreed about what we must do in 2009. But this time, it's not just about the issues. If it were, then we could well be getting ready to see who Joe Biden or Bill Richardson will pick as their vice presidential candidate.

This year, it's about the issues plus some. And that "some" is what is critically important. That "some" is what makes Barack Obama different. He has the ability to mobilize young Americans who've never cared about politics before, to make people proud of what their country stands for, to bring together Americans who thought they shared little in common other than a flag, and to show the world that, when we speak of progress, we actually mean it.

Sometimes it's easy to forget the democratic ideals that define America. To honor those ideals, we must include those people young and old; black, white, Asian, and Latino; rich and poor; Christian, Muslim and, Jewish; and, of course, Republican and Democrat. In a splintering country stumbling to lead a splintering world, now is the time for unification, and Barack Obama is the only man (or woman) who can truly unite us all.

More than 4,000 American families' final sights of their children were in caskets coming off a plane from Baghdad. Nearly 100,000 Iraqi civilians are dead. 47 million Americans' don't have health insurance. Our economy is in shambles. Politicians have cited these numbers repeatedly, but how many of them can actually mobilize our society to care to do something about them and maybe, just maybe, get something done without leaving out or ignoring large parts of the population?

Barack's message of hope has been bashed by the left and right as idealistic, empty rhetoric. But without hope, without the ability to envision a better country and a better world, we can never expect to improve; we'd simply be running in place, accomplishing very little and digging ourselves deeper and deeper into a hole without a bottom in sight. With such hope and with such dreams, we have a unique opportunity to escape that hole; if we fail to act now, who knows what may happen in the next eight years. But with a man of integrity and good judgment, honesty and intelligence like Barack Obama running for president, I feel a lot safer putting my trust in Barack Obama.

It's 3 AM and your children are safe and asleep. But there's a phone in the White House and it's ringing.

I know who I want answering that call.

2.24.2008

Letter to Candidate Nader: Please Don't Run!

Here is the text of an email I recently sent to Ralph Nader about his decision to run again and possibly botch the Democrats' chance of winning just like he did in 2000. If you feel the same way I do, shoot an email to info@nader.org

Dear Mr. Nader:

I am a 20-year old college student writing to you to ask that you please reconsider your decision to run for for president. In the fall of 2006, I attended a symposium here at Johns Hopkins University in which you spoke for an hour or so about your honorable work and the current status of the nation; I was impressed with your talk, and I had a lot of respect for what you had done to support everyday Americans during your career. However, 2008 is not the time for you to test the political waters for the fourth consecutive time. We are at a critical juncture and possess what may be a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reverse (or, at the very least, mend) the past eight years of political history to put the United States back on track. This opportunity cannot be wasted and, by throwing your hat into the ring once again, you are risking us doing just that.

Please, Mr. Nader, for the good of the citizens that you claim to support, rethink your decision about running in '08.

Thank you,
Michael Glenwick
Johns Hopkins University
Class of 2010
International Studies and Spanish Double Major

2.20.2008

Barack From the Dead

So it's been 2+ months since my last post, so I've got a lot of catching up to do. So...what's happened since my mid-December '07?

1) I went to DJ school in NYC, and didn't really learn to DJ.

2) I went to New Hampshire for seven days before the primary there to canvas for my main man, Barack Obama. It was an awesome, truly incredible experience (even if he lost). More on that later.

3) I went to Israel for ten days on a Birthright trip with a group from Hopkins and Goucher. It was great, as well, some of the best ten days of my life.

Since my deejaying skills (or lack of it) probably aren't too interesting to most people, and my vacation isn't too relevant a month later, the best place to start is with Obama, to whom I gave seven days of my life in early January--including my birthday.

In five vans designed to hold 12 people each, a group of committed NYers did the five-hour drive to Concord, NH where we spent a week in a Red Roof Inn, four to a room. When we weren't sleeping (which was most of the time), we were knocking on doors, waving signs at major intersections, and basically doing anything the campaign needed from us.

Some lessons learned:

1) NH voters are a whole lot more intelligent than the average American. They know how much attention their small primary gets and how much their vote matters. They know about the issues, and they know about all the candidates, Republicans and Democrats. If half of the U.S. knew half as much as New Hampshirites do, we'd be a better country.

2) Barack has a wider, more diverse coalition than anyone in the media will ever give him credit for. Among our volunteers were college students and some folks who had to be in their 60s if not 70s. There were whites, blacks, Latinos, and Asians; men and women; Christians and Jews; rich and poor.

Part of our NY crew talking to a NH voter (in Red Sox cap)

3) A lot of people (at least in NH) despise Hillary. As a proud Democrat, I will support whomever the Party chooses in November, but it's clear that a lot of independent, free-thinking voters (of whom there are many in NH) throughout the country will support McCain come November if Hillary is the nominee. As qualified as she may be (and she is, I think), she's more polarizing than a magnet (sorry, I couldn't resist), and we will have a tough time winning the many independents and significant number of Republicans--or Obamacans, as they are now called--who could be the answer in swing states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida.

4) The more people get to know Barack, the more they like him, and the more they are ready to support him. When I checked in to the Red Roof Inn, we were 14 points down and came within four points of Hillary. Sure, it was a disappointment but only b/c our hopes were so high. The fact that he made a ten-point jump in seven days was remarkable and a testament to both the strong volunteer support on the ground all over the state and the incredible job of fund-raising the campaign has done.

So, more than a month after the NH primary and two exciting weeks (ten straight!) since Super Tuesday, why bother mentioning the four points above? Because they're all still relevant--maybe even more so than on January 8th--and possible on a larger scale.

1) As much as certain segments of the country care more than usual about the election, most voters across the country haven't educated themselves about the issues that matter and actually gone to the polls in one of the most exciting and critical primaries in decades. Go out and vote. Go to the candidates' websites and watch the debates. It's really not that hard. Billions of people don't get to participate in free elections. Be grateful, and take advantage of your right.

2) Every day, Barack's movement--it's not just a campaign--has brought in more and more people who don't fit the mold that the media has assigned to him. No longer is it (or was it) just about young people and African Americans. Just look at Wisconsin's results last night: women left Hillary to support him, as did working class white men, previously thought to be out of his reach. And in Texas, where Hillary's lead had been in double digits, he's evened things up in the polls, thanks to greater support among Latinos.

3) Hillary's campaign has gotten more and more negative by the day. It's not going to work, and it's going to turn even more people off to her. As great as it is that people are voting for Barack all across the country, it's clear that a legit number of people (especially the moderate Republicans and independents who have been allowed to vote in some Democratic primaries) are voting as much against Hillary as for Barack. She's aiming to win that 51% majority, but, as we say at Hopkins lacrosse games, we want more! This isn't about 1/2 of the country; it's about the whole country, especially those moderates who are turned off by the Clintons.

4) In so many states where Barack wasn't given a chance, he has won or made up significant ground. He has done this a tremendously fast speed and the fact that he has gotten more and more time to make his case known to the American people. And now that he has the momentum of ten straight wins, 25 out of 36 races, and the lead in delegates (pledged and total), the doubters have no choice but to take him seriously. He is the frontrunner now, which brings with it a whole host of new challenges, but also brings legitimacy and added coverage. People who didn't know him before know him now, as we can see in Texas, where a double-digit Clinton lead has already vanished.

So, in a nutshell, that's where I believe the campaign stands as of now, and, in many ways, NH was a microcosm of that. We have two more weeks until the primaries of March 4th, and if Hillary doesn't win both OH and TX in blow-out style, we'll be in good shape for Denver in August and hopefully Washington in November!

P.S. More on the other two exciting events of my winter--deejaying and Israel--to come. Bet you can't wait.

12.13.2007

Banned: Abortion in Nicaragua

My final piece as a research associate/intern at COHA was press released a few days ago. A link to it is below:

To Risk Not Saving a Life: Abortion Ban in Nicaragua and Its Societal Implications

Check it out and give me feedback. Criticism is always more than welcome.

It was a really interesting piece to write, as the abortion ban encompasses a lot of issues (religion, public health, gender roles, etc.) that Latin America is facing as it tries to balance its traditional values with a growing desire to modernize and adapt to technological advances. In this case, obviously, the traditional values won out, but this balancing act is anything but over.


12.08.2007

Contrast This

"Compare and contrast." As a student, it seems that nearly every assignment I've ever had to complete deals with comparing and contrasting one person/issue/text to another. The question seemed to come up again on Thursday, this time when Mitt Romney made his speech, "Faith in America" at George Bush Sr.'s Presidential Library in Texas about being a Mormon running for president. A lot of people immediately rushed to make comparisons to JFK's speech (also in Texas) regarding his running for the presidency while being a Catholic.

Even Romney, in his speech, couldn't get away from the supposed comparison:

"Almost 50 years ago another candidate from Massachusetts explained that he was an American running for President, not a Catholic running for President. Like him, I am an American running for President."

However, beyond that, there are few similarities between the two men or their speeches. Kennedy, although a proud Catholic, did not want to bring faith into his campaign, since he believed that there were more pressing practical issues that faced the nation:

"
I want to emphasize from the outset that we have far more critical issues to face in the 1960 election; the spread of Communist influence, until it now festers 90 miles off the coast of Florida--the humiliating treatment of our President and Vice President by those who no longer respect our power--the hungry children I saw in West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctor bills, the families forced to give up their farms--an America with too many slums, with too few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space."

A bit dated, yes, but the message still rings rings very loudly and clearly. JFK, who went on in his speech to talk about how much he revered the concept of separation of church and state upon which this country was founded did not want faith to play a pivotal role in the election.

Romney, however, in his speech, demonstrated that he thinks otherwise:

"I'm moved by the Lord's words: 'For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: naked, and ye clothed me...'"

Faith, he made clear, is an inherent part of America. I couldn't care less that Romney happens to be a Mormon and is running for president. What I do care about is whether or not his idea of America is one that includes all Americans. He says on Thursday, "We should acknowledge the Creator as did the Founders...I will not separate us from 'the God who gave us liberty.'" He went out of his way to isolate certain segments of the American population (namely atheists) in order to make the bond between religion and the state even stronger, something to which the Founders were very opposed.

This is not what JFK did. Kennedy was a religious man, but he was a tolerant man. He understood that religion was private and that it need not be imposed on others. Most importantly, he used his Texas speech about religion to emphasize that religion should not be made into an election concern; communism, poverty, and the elderly were simply too important. Romney, on the other hand, must think otherwise. Even spoke 18 more minutes longer than Kennedy, he didn't mention domestic or international issues after the first minute. To him, religion and its attachment to the state is just as important as any other issue in the election.

Compare and contrast Romney to JFK? In order to compare the two, we would first need to find some commonalities, and other than the Massachusetts connection, it's gonna be a while before any more of those pop up. Meanwhile, the contrasting could go on forever.